Parkinson’s Law states that \u201cwork expands so as to fill the time available for its completion.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThus, an elderly lady of leisure can spend an entire day in writing and dispatching a postcard to her niece at Bognor Regis. An hour will be spent in finding the postcard, another in hunting for spectacles, half-an-hour in a search for the address, an hour and a quarter in composition, and twenty minutes in deciding whether or not to take an umbrella when going to the pillar-box in the next street. The total effort which would occupy a busy man for three minutes all told may in this fashion leave another person prostrate after a day of doubt, anxiety and toil.\u201d<\/p>\n
Interestingly, Parkinson observed a similar manifestation in the British Civil Service, noting that as Britain’s overseas empire declined in importance, the number of employees at the Colonial Office increased.<\/p>\n
According to Parkinson, this is motivated by two forces: (1) \u00ab\u00a0An official wants to multiply subordinates, not rivals\u00a0\u00bb and (2) \u00ab\u00a0Officials make work for each other.\u00a0\u00bb He also noted that the total of those employed inside a bureaucracy rose by 5-7% per year \u00ab\u00a0irrespective of any variation in the amount of work (if any) to be done\u00a0\u00bb.<\/p>\n
The analysis first appeared in an article in The Economist in November 1955 and was then articulated in a book Parkinson’s Law: The Pursuit of Progress, (London, John Murray, 1958).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"